NLRB v. Noel Canning, Several Post-Argument Observations

Jan 20, 2014
Issue:
null
Sub-Issue:
null

Michael Davidson, Former Legal Counsel, United States Senate

Synopsis: The January 13 oral argument in NLRB v. Noel Canning underscores the desirability of the Court finding a way to leave to the Executive and Legislative Branches the task of reconciling their views on the Recess Appointments Clause.

Read the full post here.

Upcoming Events

More Events...

@ConPro Tweets

RT @POGOwatchdog: If you want to get POGO's work sent straight to your inbox, subscribe to our newsletters. From @waltshaub's #TheBridge to… 10:54:22 AM July 16, 2021 Reply Retweet Favorite
RT @caitlinmacneal: @NBCNewsTHINK These two justices were part of the judicial selection task force convened by @ConPro @POGOwatchdog Rea… 02:13:02 PM July 15, 2021 Reply Retweet Favorite
RT @POGOwatchdog: New op-ed from members of our Judicial Task Force, arguing in favor of #TermLimits for #SCOTUS: "Forty-nine states don’t… 02:12:59 PM July 15, 2021 Reply Retweet Favorite

@conpro

NLRB v. Noel Canning, Several Post-Argument Observations

US Constitution

Upcoming Events

@ConPro Tweets

About Us

Contact

Sign Up

NLRB v. Noel Canning, Several Post-Argument Observations

Share

US Constitution

Upcoming Events

@ConPro Tweets

About Us

Contact

Sign Up