NLRB v. Noel Canning, Several Post-Argument Observations

Jan 20, 2014
Issue:
null
Sub-Issue:
null

Michael Davidson, Former Legal Counsel, United States Senate

Synopsis: The January 13 oral argument in NLRB v. Noel Canning underscores the desirability of the Court finding a way to leave to the Executive and Legislative Branches the task of reconciling their views on the Recess Appointments Clause.

Read the full post here.

Upcoming Events

More Events...

@ConPro Tweets

RT @POGOwatchdog: .@ConPro’s @JakeLaperruque wrote about Clearview AI last year, and the conclusions were clear: “Attempts to defend mass… 03:14:54 PM March 24, 2021 Reply Retweet Favorite
RT @POGOwatchdog: Facial recognition threatens the privacy and freedom of everyone. Read this deeply disturbing story from @kashhill on a s… 03:14:52 PM March 24, 2021 Reply Retweet Favorite
OLC’s tendency to expand presidential power has led to executive actions that have: ➡️ directly harmed people ➡️ un… https://t.co/oJsDHM4732 04:56:03 PM March 23, 2021 Reply Retweet Favorite

@conpro

NLRB v. Noel Canning, Several Post-Argument Observations

US Constitution

Upcoming Events

@ConPro Tweets

About Us

Contact

Sign Up

NLRB v. Noel Canning, Several Post-Argument Observations

Share

US Constitution

Upcoming Events

@ConPro Tweets

About Us

Contact

Sign Up